What to Know About the Apple Class Action Lawsuit Settlement—and How You Can File a Claim
Apple users—specifically those who use Siri through products such as Macbooks, iPhones, and Apple TVs—may be entitled to make a claim after Apple’s class action lawsuit settlement, worth $95 million dollars, regarding the voice-activated assistant.
The settlement comes from a lawsuit filed in 2021 by Californian Fumiko Lopez, who claimed that Apple, via Siri, conducted “unlawful and intentional interception and recording of individuals’ confidential communications without their consent and subsequent unauthorized disclosure of those communications.”
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]“Apple intentionally, willfully, and knowingly violated consumers’ privacy rights, including within the sanctity of consumers’ own homes where they have the greatest expectation of privacy,” the lawsuit stated. “Plaintiffs and Class Members would not have bought their Siri Devices, or would have paid less for them, if they had known Apple was intercepting, recording, disclosing, and otherwise misusing their conversations without consent or authorization.”
In 2019, Apple published a statement titled “Improving Siri’s privacy protections,” in which they said they hadn’t “been fully living up” to their “high ideals” and vowed to issue improvements.
Apple agreed to the settlement on Dec. 31, 2024. According to the settlement website: “Apple denies all of the allegations made in the lawsuit and denies that [they] did anything improper or unlawful.”
The website also provides information about who is eligible to file a claim and the deadlines they need to adhere to.
Here’s what you need to know about how you can file a claim:
Who is eligible to file a claim?
People eligible to make a claim include those who owned or purchased a Siri device—which includes the iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, MacBook, iMac, HomePod, iPod touch, Apple TV—between Sept. 17, 2024 and Dec. 31, 2024. They must have “purchased or owned a Siri Device in the United States or its territories and enabled Siri on that device.”
According to the settlement agreement, eligible parties also should have “experienced an unintended Siri activation during a confidential or private communication.”
Those not eligible include Apple employees, legal representatives, and judicial officers assigned to the case.
How can you make a claim and when is the deadline?
Claimants can submit a claim form via the settlement website, and can submit claims for up to five Siri devices.
The deadline to make a claim is July 2, 2025. This is also the deadline to opt out of the payment, which would allow the customer to keep their right to bring any other claim against Apple arising out of, or related to, the claims in the case.
Some of those eligible to make a claim may have received a postcard or an email—with the subject line “Lopez Voice Assistant Class Action Settlement”—notifying them about the settlement. This correspondence would likely include a Claim Identification Code and a Confirmation Code. Per the settlement website, people can use these codes when making a claim, but eligible Apple customers who haven’t received any correspondence can still file a claim.
When can you expect to receive payment?
On August 1, 2025, the courts are due to host a final approval hearing, but there could still be appeals. Payments will only be issued after any appeals are resolved. The settlement website is set to keep customers updated on timings and payment schedules, as and when that information is available.
Source: Tech – TIME | 15 May 2025 | 3:58 am
Trump is Rewriting How the U.S. Treats AI Chip Exports—and the Stakes Are Enormous
This week, President Trump traveled to the Middle East on a business and diplomacy mission, during which he greenlit the sale of hundreds of thousands of American-made AI chips to firms in the UAE and Saudi Arabia. These deals signal a major shift in the U.S.’s approach to cutting-edge AI technology. Previously, U.S. leaders had focused on limiting access to ultra-powerful chips, especially to countries that might pose national security threats. Now, Trump is using them as leverage for his larger trade ambitions.
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]While Trump was at the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum in Riyadh—held in parallel with his visit—the White House announced that Saudi Arabia was committing $600 billion in investments in the United States, “building economic ties that will endure for generations to come,” Onstage at the conference, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang announced his company was entering a massive partnership with Humain, a new company owned by the Saudi kingdom’s Public Investment Fund, and sending them hundreds of thousands of chips. Rival chipmaker AMD announced its own $10 billion Saudi Arabian project. Another deal in the works could send hundreds of thousands of chips to the Emirati firm G42.
While Trump allies heralded the deal as mutually beneficial to all parties, some national security experts have concerns about the longterm impacts of spreading these chips around the world.
“AI chips should not be bargaining chips for broader trade deals,” says Janet Egan, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS). “They underpin US AI dominance, and we have to be really careful to not make short term decisions that might be beneficial for trade in the near term, but cede AI leadership in the longer term.”
Early this year the Chinese company Deepseek revealed that it had developed a very powerful model mostly using Nvidia chips obtained before the Biden administration closed an export loophole in 2023, heightening the intensity of the race. President Biden, in his final weeks, ratcheted up export controls, including limits on countries in the Gulf.
Last week, the Trump administration ripped up those rules, with a spokesperson calling them “overly complex, bureaucratic” and saying they “would stymie American innovation.” They then switched to a new tack: linking countries’ access to AI chips with larger trade negotiations. Transitioning to a negotiation-based approach, the administration argued, could allow for more flexibility from country-to-country and allow Trump to secure key business concessions from Middle Eastern partners.
Business and governments in the Middle East have massive ambitions for AI, aiming to position themselves at the forefront of this emerging technology. They benefit from several strategic advantages to do so, including access to boundless energy, free-flowing capital thanks to oil and sovereign wealth funds, and a lack of government restrictions—allowing them to rapidly push through massive infrastructure projects. But until now, the Middle East had lacked one crucial puzzle piece: Access to cutting-edge American chips from companies like Nvidia.
Now, the amount of chips that U.S. companies will reportedly send to the UAE and Saudi Arabia is massive: “We’re talking about something larger than any AI training system that exists in the world today,” says Alasdair Phillips-Robins, a fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Conceivably, the ultra-powerful models built with this training system could synthesize automated cyber-attacks, intelligence collection, and weapons development.
This is potentially problematic to some U.S. analysts, given Saudi Arabia and the UAE’s close ties with China. In previous years, American spy agencies issued warnings that G42 could be a conduit for siphoning advanced American technology to China. G42 denied any connections to the Chinese government or military.
“If you think about which country should be leading the future of potentially the most critical and transformative technology we’ve ever had, I would not want that to be a non-democratic authoritarian regime,” Egan says.
On Tuesday, the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, led by Michigan Republican John Moolenaar, wrote on Twitter that the new chip deals “present a vulnerability for the CCP to exploit.”
Sam Winter-Levy, another Carnegie Endowment fellow, worries that the deal will encourage U.S. AI companies to move to the Gulf, where they might get better deals on energy and avoid U.S. regulations and community pushback. Prominent U.S. companies have wasted no time in seizing the new opportunity presented by the Trump administration. OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, and AMD’s Lisa Su all attended the Saudi-U.S.Investment Forum. The AI startup Scale AI—which has a partnership with the U.S. government to develop AI safety standards—announced its intentions to open an office in Saudi Arabia. Google, too, advanced an AI hub in the country.
“You could end up in a position where some large proportion of U.S. computing power has been offshored to a bunch of states that can wield leverage over U.S. foreign policy to shape it in ways that may not align with US national interests,” says Winter-Levy,.
Winter-Levy also contends that these AI chip deals go against Trump’s past emphasis on an “America first” foreign policy approach. “This is offshoring data centers that could be built in the United States. This is offshoring chips that could be going to US tech companies,” he says. “It’s hard to reconcile this with an America First approach to industrial policy or economic policy in general.”
Source: Tech – TIME | 15 May 2025 | 1:53 am
Why Top Democrats Are Revolting on Crypto Legislation
Just a few months ago, the crypto industry seemed unstoppable in Washington. It had the support of a pro-crypto president in Donald Trump, a slew of new pro-crypto legislators in both parties, and newly elevated regulators who pledged to not impede the industry’s growth. Many assumed the speedy passage of pro-crypto legislation as a foregone conclusion after Trump asked Congress to send him a stablecoin bill to sign by August.
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]That momentum hit a major snag over the last few days, as Trump’s expanding investment in the industry coincides with a revolt from Democrats who had previously supported the leading crypto legislation.
On Tuesday, California Rep. Maxine Waters, the ranking Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, objected to a hearing on crypto, effectively blocking it from taking place, and called for legislation that would ban Presidents and members of Congress from owning crypto assets and firms. Trump’s family owns and operates World Liberty Financial, which debuted a stablecoin this week that immediately shot into the top ten stablecoins by market capitalization.
In the Senate, a group of nine Democrats announced they would not support a stablecoin bill, called the GENIUS Act, without major changes, significantly narrowing its pathway to 60 votes. Meanwhile, Senate Banking Committee staff and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the ranking Democrat on the committee, circulated a memo to her fellow Senate Democrats urging them to demand amendments that might address the bill’s national security concerns.
“If Congress is going to supercharge the use of stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies, it must include safeguards that make it harder for criminals, terrorists, and foreign adversaries to exploit the financial system and put our national security at risk,” read the memo, which was obtained by TIME.
The GENIUS Act is still headed for a vote in the Senate on Thursday, Politico reported. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he was open to making changes to reach a compromise that addresses Democrats’ concerns. Here are some of the major objections to the bill, and how the fight may play out this week.
Conflict of interest concerns
Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to hold the value of a U.S. dollar. For many lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, passing a stablecoin bill seemed more feasible this year than tackling a larger crypto market structure bill, especially because stablecoins are less volatile and their value is usually tied to actual money sitting in a bank.
Read More: What Are Stablecoins?
But in March, Trump’s World Liberty Financial announced a new stablecoin, leading to concerns that the new legislation would essentially give Trump even more oversight over his own financial product. (In February, Trump issued an executive order placing independent financial regulators like the FTC, FCC and SEC under his own control.)
Trump has only escalated his crypto dealings. Last week, World Liberty Financial announced that an Emirati company planned to use the firm’s new stablecoin for a $2 billion investment in Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange. Trump also announced that he would host an exclusive dinner for top investors of his $TRUMP meme coin—which Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, a staunch Trump supporter and cryptocurrency advocate, admitted “gave [her] pause.”
Waters had been working on stablecoin legislation for years. But last month, she reversed course, saying that she opposed any bill that would allow Trump to own a stablecoin. On Tuesday, she walked out of a joint House hearing on crypto, later saying: “I’m deeply concerned that Republicans aren’t just ignoring Trump’s corruption. They are legitimatizing Trump’s and his family’s efforts to enrich themselves on the backs of average Americans.”
Waters then staged her own hearing on stablecoins. Notably, however, several Democrats remained at the original hearing, including Rep. Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, the ranking member on a subcommittee focused on digital assets, and Rep. Angie Craig of Minnesota. “This is a really important conversation. I’m here because I think we need to be engaged, and part of the discussion,” Craig said.
Craig, however, agreed that Waters was raising important issues. “It’s important and it’s legitimate to call out the self-dealing from the Trump administration related to hawking meme coins from the White House,” she said. “It’s corrupt, it’s wrong, and it makes this process of coming together to regulate crypto more partisan.”
National Security Concerns
While some Democrats are focused on stopping Trump from owning a stablecoin while he’s in office, others are concerned that the current stablecoin bills in Congress could have unintended consequences. Warren, who has long been a crypto skeptic, has particularly honed in on the ripple effects on national security, arguing that the bill would make it easier for terrorists and malicious state actors to steal and cash out illicit funds.
In February, hackers backed by the North Korean government stole $1.5 billion in cryptocurrencies from the crypto exchange Bybit, as part of a larger continuing effort to steal crypto funds from around the world. The Bybit hack was the largest in crypto history—and foreign policy experts believe that the stolen funds are being used to fund the development of missile and nuclear weapons technology.
So Warren and Banking Committee staffers circulated a memo on Monday, which calls for changes to the GENIUS Act, including the implementation of strict anti-money laundering requirements on exchanges handling digital assets. It argues that the bill should extend U.S. sanctions laws to stablecoins, and that stablecoin issuers should be required to monitor blockchains and report criminal activity.
The nine Democrats who revoked their support of the GENIUS Act now hold significant leverage over the bill. It is not clear what changes to the bill would be enough to regain their support. “We’ve been very clear to our Republican colleagues for weeks about the changes that we need,” Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, one of those nine Democrats, told TIME on Tuesday.
Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego, who led the Democrats’ statement opposing the bill, told TIME that his priorities were beefing up consumer protections and national security issues. “We can tighten up the ‘who can issue, what country can issue’ question,” he says. “It’s incredibly important when it comes to closing some of the Tether loopholes.”
Democratic Sen. Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland, a co-sponsor of the bill, told TIME she believes that the bill should require crypto companies dealing with stablecoins to adopt anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFL) rules. “We still have a little time, but everybody’s motivated, and we’re all working together to try to get to the best place we can,” she says. “We want to make sure that all of the concerns around national security are addressed.”
Republican Sen. Bill Hagerty of Tennessee, one of the bill’s authors, appeared unfazed by the challenges. “I’m beyond optimistic. I’m confident it will pass,” he told TIME.
Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders announced that he would host a livestream with other critics of the GENIUS Act on Wednesday to discuss how it “threatens the stability of our financial system.”
The crypto industry is continuing to push for the bill’s passage. Dante Disparte, a leader at the stablecoin issuer Circle, tells TIME that more harms come from the absence of legislation. “Past failures to pass bipartisan stablecoin legislation have harmed U.S. consumers, markets, national security, and dollar competitiveness,” he wrote in an email, citing the failure of the foreign stablecoin project Terra-Luna in 2022.
Source: Tech – TIME | 7 May 2025 | 8:24 am
Why This Artist Isn’t Afraid of AI’s Role in the Future of Art
As AI enters the workforce and seeps into all facets of our lives at unprecedented speed, we’re told by leaders across industries that if you’re not using it, you’re falling behind. Yet when AI’s use in art enters the conversation, some retreat in discomfort, shunning it as an affront to the very essence of art. This ongoing debate continues to create disruptions among artists. AI is fundamentally changing the creative process, and its purpose, significance, and influence are subjective to one’s own values—making its trajectory hard to predict, and even harder to confront.
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]Miami-based Panamanian photographer Dahlia Dreszer stands out as an optimist and believer in AI’s powers. She likens AI’s use in art to the act of painting or drawing—simply another medium that can unlock creative potential and an artistic vision that may have never been realized without it. Using generative AI models like Stable Diffusion, 3.5, Midjourney, Adobe, Firefly, and Nova, Dreszer trained an AI image generator on her style for over a year, instructing it to produce artwork with her sensibilities, with one piece in her current exhibition produced entirely by AI.
Entitled “Bringing the Outside In,” Dreszer calls the show a “living organism.” (It is on display until May 17, 2025 at Green Space Miami.) Her vivid, maximalist still lifes depict layered familial heirlooms, Judaica, flowers, and textiles made by Panamanian indigenous women. Attendees can interact with an AI image generator in the exhibition to produce their own artworks in Dreszer’s style, telling the machine in a sentence or two what they want it to produce, and in seconds, an artwork is created. Also as part of the show, Dreszer programmed an AI-generated clone of herself, which looks and speaks like her, to guide visitors via video chat through the space.
This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity.
TIME: Take me back to the first moment you realized AI could enhance your art. What about AI drew you in? What did you feel?
Dreszer: I believe technology is here to supercharge us. When generative AI entered the mainstream, I knew I wanted to get my hands dirty right away. I was already in the world of NFTs, but this was a different conversation. It took over a year of experimentation and dialogue with image generators to feel comfortable finally creating a piece to include in a body of work.
This exhibition includes one piece I made in collaboration with AI. I personalized an AI image model on what the exhibition means, feels like, and looks like, feeding it images embodying my style. I included the Florida Everglades in the foreground, reflecting the landscape where I’m living today. I’m not only interested in AI and art, but also in adding nature to that conversation. I’ve hung flowers on top of this piece that fall onto the frame or the ground when they die, allowing nature to do its thing. I have not intervened physically. I believe nature, art and technology can coexist nicely.
I actually thought that all the pieces in your exhibition were produced by AI.
That’s also the intention, right, because they are not. I’m always trying to play with the viewers, to disorient, because everything is not what you see at first glance. There’s no artificial enhancements in most of these works, but just the fact that you think there are—I find that narrative interesting.
What inspired you to create a clone for this exhibition?
My clone is so fun. I’m trying to pose questions to the community as they engage with these works: Moving forward, what does it mean for relationships when we’re speaking to a machine as if it was a human, and we cannot know the difference? What is our role as humans if we have clones that can mimic what we do? I want to see how that dialogue evolves. There’s a practicality as well. The clone guides you through the show, probably better than I can. It’s trained on what I know, but as a machine, it’s supercharged.
Why did you include your clone?
I wanted to have an AI version of myself to guide viewers and answer questions, to educate others in order to demystify AI. Through the clone, I can humanize the technology, “the art of the possible,” of incorporating technology into artistic workflows.
Will you keep your clone after the exhibition? Will you educate it about other parts of yourself?
I’m very interested in continuing the relationship with her. I’m working through ideas and ways to train her. I haven’t shared it yet, but there are different personas of the clone. I’ll be fine tuning and creating different versions based on the relationship I want her to have with the audience she’s engaging with.
Some critics would call the use of AI in art “cheating.” What do you say to those critics?
I’d love to have a conversation to understand how that opinion was formed. I’d encourage them to see it as a collaboration. Many people don’t understand the process and the time it takes.
I would invite critics to dive deeper, and think about it not just as: “I put in a prompt, it makes art, then I’m done.” It’s a long process.But this relationship between technology and the arts is not new. We’ve had disruptions in art through technology before. This is just more aggressive, intrusive, and rapid in its speed and pace of innovation.
What specific challenges have you faced so far using AI in your art?
Oftentimes the outputs are not what I wanted. As an artist, I have high expectations. I like to control the visualization so it’s highly stylized, curated, and composed. With AI, that control goes away, because AI has its own intelligence and creativity, no matter how good the prompt is. It’s a hard and frustrating yet also enlightening process; it may not create what you wanted, but it can make something you didn’t know you wanted. Then there’s technical things it doesn’t know how to do, but eventually will. It’s not great with certain renders or visualizations.
What scares and excites you about where AI is headed for the next generation of artists?
I’m mostly excited because of the rapid pace. Updates to generative AI software happen in a matter of weeks. There’s also a healthy competition in the market, which means that as users, our needs are being satisfied quicker than ever. Our feedback is being incorporated and the tools are changing.
You asked about fears. AI is entering our workflows and industries in one way or another. Will we accept it? Deny it? Who will fall behind, and who will be at the forefront? I’m more excited than fearful, but I see why others may be fearful. It disrupts our workflows, and if we’re not ready to change or learn new skills, it can be scary.
Will collaboration with AI replace collaboration between artists?
No, no, no. There are many examples of how me and several artists have collaborated with AI. One artist came to me with her artistic vision and her words, and I used my prompt engineering skills and knowledge of AI systems, and together, we created an AI piece that was her vision come to life—this beautiful red textile tree that had a huge trunk.
As an artist, there is a journey one goes through when creating. When you use AI, does it still allow you to access this other-worldly experience of the creative process?
There’s definitely parts of the creative process that AI is not inclusive of. So for example, when I’m making AI art, I’m not painting, or getting my hands dirty. There’s physicalities that are not included in that journey. But I think that’s similar to any medium. So let’s say I’m choosing to use my camera as my tool and not a paint brush. There’s also experiences that are missed out through my photographic artistic process, that if I were using a paintbrush or another tool, would be a different journey. So that’s why I see generative AI art as its own medium, and each medium comes with its own journeys and processes that are exclusive to that medium, right?
Do you see the term “post-human” as an accurate way to reflect this era we are entering in art?
I would divert a bit from “post-human.” I see AI more as a booster, not a replacer, but an accelerator and an enabler. So, if “post-human” means it’s a replacement, then I would lean in more to the perspective of AI as a turbo supercharger that us humans can carry with us to bolt forward. I think it could replace mundane tasks that we may not want to do. And that’s where the beauty of the collaboration comes in, where we give it these tasks so our human brains reach our fullest potential, because then the low value tasks we can outsource into generative AI.
How do you think historians will look back on this particular era of rapid expansion with AI?
We are in the foundation era. Everyone knows what ChatGPT is. We’ve passed the point of inflection, and now we’re at a point where industries, individuals, businesses, and creatives are finding their place in AI. How are we adapting–or not–to it? Time is of the essence. What we decide to do now, literally today, versus in a week or two, or three, or in a month, will define the next five to 10 years.
Source: Tech – TIME | 6 May 2025 | 5:01 am
UK porn watchers could have faces scanned
New draft guidance sets out how porn websites and apps should stop children viewing their content.Source: BBC News - Technology | 6 Dec 2023 | 12:04 am
GTA 6: Trailer for new game revealed after online leak
Rockstar Games releases the trailer 15 hours earlier than expected after it is leaked online.Source: BBC News - Technology | 5 Dec 2023 | 11:57 pm
Ex-Tesla employee casts doubt on car safety
A whistleblower believes the self-driving vehicle technology is not safe enough for public roads.Source: BBC News - Technology | 5 Dec 2023 | 9:01 pm
Booking.com users angry at firm's response to hacks
Customers say they have been failed and feel let down after losing hundreds of pounds to fraudsters.Source: BBC News - Technology | 5 Dec 2023 | 2:21 am
Amazon, Valentino file joint lawsuit over shoes counterfeiting
Italian luxury brand Valentino and Internet giant Amazon have filed a joint lawsuit against New York-based Kaitlyn Pan Group for allegedly counterfeiting Valentino's shoes and offering them for sale online.Source: Reuters: Technology News | 19 Jun 2020 | 2:48 am
DC superheroes coming to your headphones as Spotify signs podcast deal
Podcasts featuring Batman, Wonder Woman and Superman will soon stream on Spotify as the Swedish music streaming company has signed a deal with AT&T Inc's Warner Bros and DC Entertainment.Source: Reuters: Technology News | 19 Jun 2020 | 2:44 am
UK ditches COVID-19 app model to use Google-Apple system
Britain on Thursday said it would switch to Apple and Google technology for its test-and-trace app, ditching its current system in a U-turn for the troubled programme.Source: Reuters: Technology News | 19 Jun 2020 | 2:42 am
Russia lifts ban on Telegram messaging app after failing to block it
Russia on Thursday lifted a ban on the Telegram messaging app that had failed to stop the widely-used programme operating despite being in force for more than two years.Source: Reuters: Technology News | 19 Jun 2020 | 1:54 am
Galaxy S9's new rival? OnePlus 6 will be as blazingly fast but with 256GB storage
OnePlus 6 throws down the gauntlet to Samsung's Galaxy S9, with up to 8GB of RAM and 256GB storage.Source: Latest articles for ZDNet | 5 Apr 2018 | 12:25 am
Mozilla launches new effort to lure users back to the Firefox browser
With a revamped browser and a nonprofit mission focused on privacy and user empowerment, Mozilla is ready to strike while the iron's hot.Source: Latest articles for ZDNet | 4 Apr 2018 | 11:00 pm
Intel: We now won't ever patch Spectre variant 2 flaw in these chips
A handful of CPU families that Intel was due to patch will now forever remain vulnerable.Source: Latest articles for ZDNet | 4 Apr 2018 | 10:49 pm
Cloud computing: Don't forget these factors when you make the move
Neglecting some basic issues could leave your cloud computing project struggling.Source: Latest articles for ZDNet | 4 Apr 2018 | 10:34 pm
GDS loses government data policy to DCMS
Source: ComputerWeekly.com | 30 Mar 2018 | 5:58 pm
Europol operation nabs another 20 cyber criminals
Source: ComputerWeekly.com | 30 Mar 2018 | 6:15 am
Business unaware of scale of cyber threat
Source: ComputerWeekly.com | 30 Mar 2018 | 1:45 am
UK government secures public sector discounts on Microsoft cloud products to April 2021
Source: ComputerWeekly.com | 29 Mar 2018 | 11:58 pm
Fitbit warns over tough competition, after selling fewer devices in 2017
Source: Technology | 27 Feb 2018 | 11:38 am
Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9+: The best deals and where to buy
Source: Technology | 27 Feb 2018 | 7:09 am
Google Glass set for comeback, hardware boss hints
Source: Technology | 27 Feb 2018 | 5:47 am
Amazon plans fix for Echo speakers that expose children to explicit songs
Source: Technology | 27 Feb 2018 | 4:50 am
Driverless 'Roborace' car makes street track debut
It is a car kitted out with technology its developers boldly predict will transform our cities and change the way we live.Source: CNN.com - Technology | 19 Nov 2016 | 9:21 am
How to outsmart fake news in your Facebook feed
Fake news is actually really easy to spot -- if you know how. Consider this your New Media Literacy Guide.Source: CNN.com - Technology | 19 Nov 2016 | 9:21 am
Flying a sports car with wings
Piloting one of the breed of light aircraft is said to be as easy as driving a carSource: CNN.com - Technology | 19 Nov 2016 | 9:17 am
Revealed: Winners of the 'Oscars of watches'
It's the prize giving ceremony that everyone's on time for.Source: CNN.com - Technology | 19 Nov 2016 | 9:17 am